SIGHTLINES
Plenty of space |
DIDACTICS
I can appreciate Saatchi's philosophy of trying to encourage people to form their own ideas and opinions about the works they display, however I think this will impact what people take away from their time in the gallery. If someone has a strong interest in art they might investigate pieces of interest from the collection, but other people might just see what they see and learn nothing more. This isn't necessarily good or bad, but I it might leave people with a lot of questions that will end up unanswered, and I don't know if that sits right with me. I think Saatchi needs to work on their didactics, first in placement and clarity - the labels are often far away and unclear which piece they refer to (if you want to look into something further it helps to know the title and artist). Section panels giving (if possible) thematic overviews like in the Tate Modern might help create a foundation for personal reflection on the artworks. Another option would be a small amount of information on the creation process which can have a big impact on our understanding of art, especially contemporary art. For example the first pieces we were shown on the tour - Up and Down sculptures by Juliana Cerqueira Leite was pretty incomprehensible when I first saw it but just with the explanation of the process we can begin to make our own interpretations.
I can appreciate Saatchi's philosophy of trying to encourage people to form their own ideas and opinions about the works they display, however I think this will impact what people take away from their time in the gallery. If someone has a strong interest in art they might investigate pieces of interest from the collection, but other people might just see what they see and learn nothing more. This isn't necessarily good or bad, but I it might leave people with a lot of questions that will end up unanswered, and I don't know if that sits right with me. I think Saatchi needs to work on their didactics, first in placement and clarity - the labels are often far away and unclear which piece they refer to (if you want to look into something further it helps to know the title and artist). Section panels giving (if possible) thematic overviews like in the Tate Modern might help create a foundation for personal reflection on the artworks. Another option would be a small amount of information on the creation process which can have a big impact on our understanding of art, especially contemporary art. For example the first pieces we were shown on the tour - Up and Down sculptures by Juliana Cerqueira Leite was pretty incomprehensible when I first saw it but just with the explanation of the process we can begin to make our own interpretations.
Leite at work |
COLLECTION
I would say the Saatchi Gallery definitely shows an adventurous assortment of artists. The work comes from a variety of artists from the more well-known to unknowns, and from older to younger. They take chances with their selections and are not afraid to show work that makes a statement. I also think most of the pieces on display now (although the show is called 'British Art Now') is very representative of trends in contemporary art, so I feel like I understand its language because at UW I am immersed in it. I do find the work to be a little hit or miss, and the craft can be questionable, leaving me with the feeling that I appreciate something but maybe it isn't on the level to be displayed in such a prominent gallery. It can feel a bit like an MFA show at times, I actually think the 3D work is pretty strong, like Steve Bishop's Christian Dior - J'adore (Mountain Goat) combining a taxidermied goat with a large concrete version of a Dior perfume bottle.
No comments:
Post a Comment